DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
MazdaMakeBMW
3ModelX3
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
9,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
205 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
360 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank67 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size225/60 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationBMW X3
4460 mmLength4648 mm
1755 mmWidth1881 mm
1470 mmHeight1661 mm
1390 KgWeight1660 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…