2012 • Peugeot
408
Peugeot 408 2.0 (147 Hp) 2012Overall Score71.5/100
2012 Peugeot 408 vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 CD (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Peugeot 408
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Peugeot 408SpecificationMazda 3
PeugeotMakeMazda
408Model3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Peugeot 408SpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
201 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
200 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Peugeot 408SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Peugeot 408SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Peugeot 408SpecificationMazda 3
4688 mmLength4460 mm
1815 mmWidth1755 mm
1525 mmHeight1470 mm
1402 KgWeight1390 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Peugeot 408 and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Peugeot 408 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…