DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 BMW X3 vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 3
BMWMakeMazda
X3Model3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 3
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
195 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17 VTyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationMazda 3
4648 mmLength4460 mm
1881 mmWidth1755 mm
1661 mmHeight1470 mm
1660 KgWeight1390 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 BMW X3 and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…