DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Peugeot 408 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 408

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 408
MazdaMakePeugeot
3Model408
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 408
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
360 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 408
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 408
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 408
4460 mmLength4688 mm
1755 mmWidth1815 mm
1470 mmHeight1525 mm
1390 KgWeight1402 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Peugeot 408 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 408 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…