DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C4
MazdaMakeCitroen
3ModelC4
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C4
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
360 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C4
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen C4
4460 mmLength4588 mm
1755 mmWidth1773 mm
1470 mmHeight1486 mm
1390 KgWeight1338 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…