DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V40
MazdaMakeVolvo
3ModelV40
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V40
11,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
186 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
270 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V40
4460 mmLength4369 mm
1755 mmWidth1783 mm
1470 mmHeight1420 mm
1255 KgWeight1463 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…