DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Honda FIT vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
HondaMakeMazda
FITModel3
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
134 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationMazda 3
3955 mmLength4460 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1525 mmHeight1470 mm
1080 KgWeight1255 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Honda FIT and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…