DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
3ModelMegane
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
182 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91T; 205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4299 mm
1795 mmWidth1785 mm
1450 mmHeight1423 mm
1190 KgWeight1205 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…