2016 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi (95 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
2016 Ford Focus vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.5 SkyActiv-G (100 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
FocusModel3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
12,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
182 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
270 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 215/50 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationMazda 3
4358 mmLength4460 mm
1823 mmWidth1795 mm
1484 mmHeight1450 mm
1338 KgWeight1190 Kg
2648 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Focus and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…