DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen Berlingo vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
BerlingoModel3
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,4-13.4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
166 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
99 HPPower100 HP
254 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/65 R15; 215/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4460 mm
1810 mmWidth1795 mm
1801-1862 mmHeight1450 mm
1374-1559 KgWeight1190 Kg
2728 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen Berlingo and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…