DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Hyundai i30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationHyundai i30
MazdaMakeHyundai
3Modeli30
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationHyundai i30
10,8 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
182 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1582 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationHyundai i30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationHyundai i30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationHyundai i30
4460 mmLength4340 mm
1795 mmWidth1795 mm
1450 mmHeight1455 mm
1190 KgWeight1263-1411 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Hyundai i30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…