2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.5 SkyActiv-G (100 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.5 TDCi (95 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelFocus
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
10,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
182 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank53 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Focus
4460 mmLength4358 mm
1795 mmWidth1823 mm
1450 mmHeight1484 mm
1190 KgWeight1338 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2648 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…