2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.5 SkyActiv-G (100 Hp) 2016Overall Score59.25/100
2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Ford EcoSport Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
EcoSport
Ford EcoSport 1.5 TDCi (95 Hp) 2016Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord EcoSport
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelEcoSport
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord EcoSport
10,8 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
182 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord EcoSport
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord EcoSport
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord EcoSport
4460 mmLength4273 mm
1795 mmWidth1765 mm
1450 mmHeight1650 mm
1190 KgWeight1372 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2519 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…