DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
3ModelKangoo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
182 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EDC
205/60 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4282 mm
1795 mmWidth1829 mm
1450 mmHeight1805 mm
1190 KgWeight1300-1430 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2697 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…