DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 2 vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationMazda 3
MazdaMakeMazda
2Model3
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationMazda 3
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
175 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
205 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/55 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationMazda 3
3920 mmLength4460 mm
1695 mmWidth1795 mm
1475 mmHeight1450 mm
1025 KgWeight1190 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 2 and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…