DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Ford EcoSport vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
EcoSportModel3
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
160 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
205 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/60 R16 92H; 205/50 R17 93WTyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4273 mmLength4460 mm
1765 mmWidth1795 mm
1648 mmHeight1450 mm
1384 KgWeight1190 Kg
2519 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Ford EcoSport and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…