DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Toyota Avanza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelAvanza
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
270 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank45 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/60 R16Tyre size185/70 R14; 185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4190 mm
1795 mmWidth1660 mm
1450 mmHeight1695 mm
1270 KgWeight1155-1160 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2655 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Toyota Avanza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…