DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Toyota Avanza vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
AvanzaModel3
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
136 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
185/70 R14; 185/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4190 mmLength4460 mm
1660 mmWidth1795 mm
1695 mmHeight1450 mm
1155-1160 KgWeight1270 Kg
2655 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Toyota Avanza and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…