DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford KA vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
KAModel3
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
143 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationMazda 3
4254 mmLength4460 mm
1695 mmWidth1795 mm
1460 mmHeight1450 mm
1048 KgWeight1270 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford KA and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…