DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 3 vs 2003 Peugeot 307 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 307
MazdaMakePeugeot
3Model307
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 307
14,3 s0–100 km/h16,5 s
169 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
84 HPPower68 HP
122 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 307
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 307
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationPeugeot 307
4420 mmLength4202 mm
1755 mmWidth1730 mm
1465 mmHeight1512 mm
1180 KgWeight1179 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 3 and 2003 Peugeot 307 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…