DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModel3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
164 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1349 cc
68 HPPower84 HP
150 NmTorque122 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4420 mm
1698 mmWidth1755 mm
1405 mmHeight1465 mm
1120 KgWeight1180 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…