DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Fusion vs 2003 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FusionSpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
FusionModel3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford FusionSpecificationMazda 3
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
158 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1349 cc
68 HPPower84 HP
160 NmTorque122 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FusionSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FusionSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FusionSpecificationMazda 3
4020 mmLength4420 mm
1708 mmWidth1755 mm
1503 mmHeight1465 mm
1105 KgWeight1180 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Fusion and 2003 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…