2003 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.4i (84 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
2003 Mazda 3 vs 2003 Ford Fusion Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 1.4 TDCi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Fusion
MazdaMakeFord
3ModelFusion
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Fusion
14,3 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
169 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1349 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
84 HPPower68 HP
122 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Fusion
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Fusion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationFord Fusion
4420 mmLength4020 mm
1755 mmWidth1708 mm
1465 mmHeight1503 mm
1180 KgWeight1105 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2488 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 3 and 2003 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…