2010 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.4 CD (68 Hp) 2010Overall Score49.25/100
2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Volkswagen Fox Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volkswagen
Fox
Volkswagen Fox 1.3 i (75 Hp) 2010Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Fox
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationVolkswagen Fox
MazdaMakeVolkswagen
2ModelFox
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationVolkswagen Fox
15,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
162 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
68 HPPower75 HP
160 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationVolkswagen Fox
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationVolkswagen Fox
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationVolkswagen Fox
3900 mmLength3828 mm
1695 mmWidth1660 mm
1475 mmHeight1544 mm
975 KgWeight1012 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2465 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Volkswagen Fox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Fox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…