DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Citroen C3 vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationMazda 2
CitroenMakeMazda
C3Model2
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationMazda 2
14,2 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
163 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
73 HPPower68 HP
118 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationMazda 2
3941 mmLength3900 mm
1728 mmWidth1695 mm
1524 mmHeight1475 mm
1030 KgWeight975 Kg
2466 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Citroen C3 and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…