DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Fox vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Fox

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
FoxModel2
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
167 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
124 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3828 mmLength3900 mm
1660 mmWidth1695 mm
1544 mmHeight1475 mm
1012 KgWeight975 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Fox and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Fox leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…