DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
MazdaMakeSkoda
2ModelFabia
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
15,5 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
162 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
68 HPPower86 HP
160 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R14; 185/60 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationSkoda Fabia
3900 mmLength4000 mm
1695 mmWidth1642 mm
1475 mmHeight1498 mm
975 KgWeight1104 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…