DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Peugeot 206 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 206

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationPeugeot 206
MazdaMakePeugeot
2Model206
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationPeugeot 206
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
162 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1360 cc
68 HPPower75 HP
160 NmTorque111 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationPeugeot 206
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationPeugeot 206
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationPeugeot 206
3900 mmLength4188 mm
1695 mmWidth1655 mm
1475 mmHeight1452 mm
975 KgWeight—
2490 mmWheelbase2442 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Peugeot 206 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 206 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…