DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Lancia Musa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationLancia Musa
MazdaMakeLancia
2ModelMusa
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationLancia Musa
15,5 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
162 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
68 HPPower77 HP
160 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationLancia Musa
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank47 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationLancia Musa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationLancia Musa
3900 mmLength4035 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1475 mmHeight1660 mm
975 KgWeight1155 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2508 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Lancia Musa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…