DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Kia Venga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Venga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationKia Venga
MazdaMakeKia
2ModelVenga
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationKia Venga
15,5 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
162 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationKia Venga
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank48 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationKia Venga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationKia Venga
3900 mmLength4068 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1475 mmHeight1600 mm
975 KgWeight1268 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Kia Venga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Venga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…