DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Fusion
MazdaMakeFord
2ModelFusion
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Fusion
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
162 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
68 HPPower80 HP
160 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Fusion
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Fusion
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Fusion
3900 mmLength4013 mm
1695 mmWidth1724 mm
1475 mmHeight1543 mm
975 KgWeight1085 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2486 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…