DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
2ModelFocus
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Focus
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
162 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
68 HPPower80 HP
160 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Focus
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationFord Focus
3900 mmLength4342 mm
1695 mmWidth1840 mm
1475 mmHeight1497 mm
975 KgWeight1245 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…