DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Bravo
MazdaMakeFiat
2ModelBravo
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Bravo
15,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
162 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Bravo
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank57 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationFiat Bravo
3900 mmLength4336 mm
1695 mmWidth1792 mm
1475 mmHeight1498 mm
975 KgWeight1205 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…