DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
MazdaMakeCitroen
2ModelC3
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
162 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
68 HPPower73 HP
160 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationCitroen C3
3900 mmLength3941 mm
1695 mmWidth1728 mm
1475 mmHeight1524 mm
975 KgWeight1030 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…