DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 2 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
2Model25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationRover 25
15,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
160 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
68 HPPower103 HP
160 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationRover 25
3925 mmLength3990 mm
1680 mmWidth1688 mm
1545 mmHeight1417 mm
1085 KgWeight1105 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 2 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…