DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Seat Cordoba vs 2003 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Cordoba

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat CordobaSpecificationMazda 2
SeatMakeMazda
CordobaModel2
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Seat CordobaSpecificationMazda 2
11,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
188 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
100 HPPower68 HP
126 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat CordobaSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Seat CordobaSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Seat CordobaSpecificationMazda 2
4165 mmLength3925 mm
1645 mmWidth1680 mm
1420 mmHeight1545 mm
1030 KgWeight1085 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Seat Cordoba and 2003 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Cordoba leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…