E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 2 vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationMG ZR
MazdaMakeMG
2ModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationMG ZR
15,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
160 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
68 HPPower103 HP
160 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationMG ZR
3925 mmLength4011 mm
1680 mmWidth1690 mm
1545 mmHeight1400 mm
1085 KgWeight1060 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 2 and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 Seat CordobaVS2003 Mazda 2Seat Cordoba vs Mazda 22003 and 2003 model years2003 Seat IbizaVS2003 Mazda 2Seat Ibiza vs Mazda 22003 and 2003 model years2003 Skoda FabiaVS2003 Mazda 2Skoda Fabia vs Mazda 22003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Mazda 2MG ZR vs Mazda 22003 and 2003 model years2003 Rover 25VS2003 Mazda 2Rover 25 vs Mazda 22003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…