DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 2 vs 2003 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
2ModelKangoo
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

15,1 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
163 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
75 HPPower65 HP
110 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3925 mmLength3995 mm
1680 mmWidth1663 mm
1545 mmHeight1827 mm
1050 KgWeight1160 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 2 and 2003 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…