DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Perodua Kelisa vs 2003 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeMazda
KelisaModel2
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
140 km/hTop speed163 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
56 HPPower75 HP
88 NmTorque110 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3480 mmLength3925 mm
1490 mmWidth1680 mm
1425 mmHeight1545 mm
775 KgWeight1050 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Perodua Kelisa and 2003 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…