DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Kangoo vs 2003 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
KangooModel2
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
146 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
65 HPPower75 HP
160 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength3925 mm
1663 mmWidth1680 mm
1827 mmHeight1545 mm
1160 KgWeight1050 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Kangoo and 2003 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…