DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 2 vs 2003 Perodua Kelisa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakePerodua
2ModelKelisa
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,1 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
163 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement989 cc
75 HPPower56 HP
110 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size155/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3925 mmLength3480 mm
1680 mmWidth1490 mm
1545 mmHeight1425 mm
1050 KgWeight775 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 2 and 2003 Perodua Kelisa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…