DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mahindra Thar vs 2010 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MahindraMakeGreat Wall
TharModelHover CUV
2010Model year2010
Cabriolet, SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
154 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
106 HPPower130 HP
247 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size235/65 R17

Dimensions

3920 mmLength4620 mm
1726 mmWidth1800 mm
1930 mmHeight1775 mm
1750 KgWeight1830 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mahindra Thar and 2010 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…