DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2010 Mahindra Thar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMahindra
Hover CUVModelThar
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet, SUV
5Seats6
5Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
170 km/hTop speed154 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
130 HPPower106 HP
192 NmTorque247 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size235/70 R16

Dimensions

4620 mmLength3920 mm
1800 mmWidth1726 mm
1775 mmHeight1930 mm
1830 KgWeight1750 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2010 Mahindra Thar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…