DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Cadillac DE Ville Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeCadillac
MarkModelDE Ville
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,6 s
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4565 cc
284 HPPower279 HP
386 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/60 R16 VTyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5258 mm
1895 mmWidth1890 mm
1360 mmHeight1440 mm
1400 KgWeight1840 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2929 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Cadillac DE Ville approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…