DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lincoln Continental vs 2000 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeLincoln
ContinentalModelMark
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

215 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
279 HPPower284 HP
373 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size255/60 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength5255 mm
1870 mmWidth1895 mm
1420 mmHeight1360 mm
1745 KgWeight1400 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lincoln Continental and 2000 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…