DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Cadillac DE Ville vs 2000 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLincoln
DE VilleModelMark
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4565 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
279 HPPower284 HP
407 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size255/60 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5258 mmLength5255 mm
1890 mmWidth1895 mm
1440 mmHeight1360 mm
1840 KgWeight1400 Kg
2929 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Cadillac DE Ville and 2000 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…