DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 1999 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Mark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeLincoln
MarkModelMark
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

220 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
284 HPPower284 HP
386 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/60 R16 VTyre size255/60 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength5255 mm
1895 mmWidth1895 mm
1360 mmHeight1360 mm
1400 KgWeight1400 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 1999 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Mark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…