DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 AC ACE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC ACE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln MarkSpecificationAC ACE
LincolnMakeAC
MarkModelACE
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Lincoln MarkSpecificationAC ACE
—0–100 km/h5,7 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
284 HPPower326 HP
386 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln MarkSpecificationAC ACE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption15,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln MarkSpecificationAC ACE
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/60 R16 VTyre size235/45 ZR17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln MarkSpecificationAC ACE
5255 mmLength4420 mm
1895 mmWidth1870 mm
1360 mmHeight1300 mm
1400 KgWeight1510 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 2000 AC ACE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…