DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Mark vs 2000 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeAlpina
MarkModelB10
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
220 km/hTop speed269 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
284 HPPower347 HP
386 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption19,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/60 R16 VTyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5255 mmLength4805 mm
1895 mmWidth1800 mm
1360 mmHeight1420 mm
1400 KgWeight1800 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Mark and 2000 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…