DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln LS vs 2000 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeNissan
LSModelCima
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4130 cc
245 HPPower270 HP
360 NmTorque371 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size215/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength4945 mm
1860 mmWidth1780 mm
1425 mmHeight1435 mm
1710 KgWeight1730 Kg
2908 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln LS and 2000 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…